<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">VETZOO</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Veterinarija ir Zootechnika</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub"/>
      <issn pub-type="ppub"/>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>LSMU</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">6</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Investigations on Effect of Bacillus Licheniformis BL11 Probiotic Formula on Antimicrobial Resistance in Commensal Poultry E. Coli Isolates</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Dobreva</surname>
            <given-names>Dima</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Urumova</surname>
            <given-names>Valentina</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:href="mailto:valentina_62@abv.bg">valentina_62@abv.bg</email>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor2">∗∗</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="cor2"><label>∗∗</label>Corresponding author.</corresp>
      </author-notes>
      <volume>81</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>44</fpage>
      <lpage>53</lpage>
      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
        <day>26</day>
        <month>04</month>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>22</day>
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>11</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>06</day>
          <month>02</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>07</day>
          <month>02</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>The aim of the present study was to investigate phenotype resistance profiles and some</p>
        <p>genetic determinants in resident E. coli bacteria isolated from broilers whose ration was supplemented</p>
        <p>with a probiotic formula containing a Bacillus licheniformis BL11 strain (Huvepharma, Belgium).</p>
        <p>For bacteriological examination, cloacal swabs were collected at various intervals throughout the</p>
        <p>study: from day-old, 14-day-old and 28-day-old chickens. A total of 300 swabs were collected for</p>
        <p>bacteriological examination: 150 from control and 150 from probiotic-supplemented chickens. The</p>
        <p>total number of E. coli strains isolated from control and experimental broilers was 214: 107 strains</p>
        <p>from the control group and another 107 from birds that received a probiotic with the feed.</p>
        <p>Among E. coli isolates from day-old broilers in the experimental group, the highest resistance</p>
        <p>rate was observed against gentamicin (69.0%), followed by that against ampicillin and amoxicillin/</p>
        <p>clavulanic acid (52.4%). Escherichia coli isolated from probiotic-supplemented broilers at 14 days</p>
        <p>of age demonstrated statistically significantly higher rate of resistance (P ≤ 0.05) against cefotaxime</p>
        <p>(51.6%) and ceftazidime (38.7%) compared with isolates from the control group (12.0%). Also, the</p>
        <p>prevalence of E. coli strains resistant against amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in supplemented broilers</p>
        <p>(35.5%) was insignificantly lower than the respective rate in control chickens (48.0%). At 28 days</p>
        <p>of age, the resistance against ciprofloxacin in poultry E. coli isolates in probiotic-fed broilers was</p>
        <p>significantly higher (P ≤ 0.01) than the resistance rate in non-supplemented birds (85.3% and 52.7%,</p>
        <p>respectively). The resistance to ampicillin among the isolates from experimental broilers was statistically</p>
        <p>significantly more common (P ≤ 0.01), i.e., 82.3%, as well as against third generation cephalosporins</p>
        <p>(44.1%, 41.2%). The genetic analysis of resistance in commensal E. coli isolates revealed the presence</p>
        <p>of bla CTX-M-1, tetA and QnrS genes. In conclusion, we should note that in our study related to the use of</p>
        <p>Bacillus licheniformis BL 11 strain, a probiotic formula in broilers, no basic differences were observed</p>
        <p>both in terms of the prevalence of resistance to chemotherapeutics and in terms of economic indicators</p>
        <p>in the broilers in the control and experimental groups.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>resistance</kwd>
        <kwd>antimicrobial drugs</kwd>
        <kwd>probiotics</kwd>
        <kwd>commensal Escherichia coli</kwd>
        <kwd>poultry</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
